[PD] abstraction setting its own arguments

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:

> That's just an example.  But I think it is the best way to handle 
> getting args inside an abstraction because it obviates the need for all 
> of the "arg-getting" objects scattered about pd-extended,

It still wouldn't support non-default defaults of [args], nor support the 
()-parsing that [args] does, nor handle the comma-message feature of 
[args]. I think that you are making overly broad assumptions about 
people's needs.

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801