[PD] recording GEM output weird framerate

Lazzaro Nicolò Ciccolella ciccolix at tiscalinet.it
Mon Aug 9 13:02:01 CEST 2010

  Il 09/08/10 12.26, Lazzaro Nicolò Ciccolella ha scritto:
>  Il 09/08/10 12.17, Marco Donnarumma ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>> it's been a week now I'm struggling to record properly a GEM output, 
>> reading archives and forums.
>> I have fairly complex audiovisual patch with multiple geos, four 
>> pix_snaps to create motion blur effect for 1280x320 res, and data 
>> exchange through local network.
>> However I can record in a really good quality using both pix_record 
>> or pix_write.
>> The problem is the recorded video is faster than the actual one.
Hi, apologize me if it is a dumb answer, but if you apply very intensive 
motion bur and other stuf in your patch the speed of what you see in 
your gem box will be very slow. The sequence of images that is generated 
will necessarily faster than what you see when the patch is running.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100809/f18b49ee/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list