[PD] problem using [udpsend] from iemnet (or mrpeach) in a sub-process (with [pd~])
jack at rybn.org
Fri Aug 20 15:04:09 CEST 2010
Sorry for the noise, it is working with [udpsend] !
But it is still very slow.
The best is to use GEM and MSD in the same patch.
Is it normal the data transfers are so slow with sub-process (using
Is there another method to accelerate this transfert between GEM and MSD
using [pd~] and [stdout] ?
Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 14:53 +0200, Jack a écrit :
> When i try to send data from a sub-process using [udpsend] from iemlib
> (or mrpeach), it is impossible. The sub-process seems to block this
> send. The sub-process is created with [pd~].
> Is it a normal behavior ?
> Any clue to resolve this problem ?
> In fact, i'm trying to send back to the main patch data from MSD in a
> sub-process to separate GEM from MSD. When i only use [pd~] and
> [stdout], it works but it is very slow, that's why i'm trying now with
> [udpsend] without [stdout] hoping to gain speed.
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list