[PD] problem using [udpsend] from iemnet (or mrpeach) in a sub-process (with [pd~])
abonnements at revolwear.com
Fri Aug 20 15:10:12 CEST 2010
is the child or the parent doing the audio?
Am 20.08.2010 um 15:04 schrieb Jack:
> Sorry for the noise, it is working with [udpsend] !
> But it is still very slow.
> The best is to use GEM and MSD in the same patch.
> Is it normal the data transfers are so slow with sub-process (using
> [pd~]) ?
> Is there another method to accelerate this transfert between GEM and MSD
> using [pd~] and [stdout] ?
> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 14:53 +0200, Jack a écrit :
>> When i try to send data from a sub-process using [udpsend] from iemlib
>> (or mrpeach), it is impossible. The sub-process seems to block this
>> send. The sub-process is created with [pd~].
>> Is it a normal behavior ?
>> Any clue to resolve this problem ?
>> In fact, i'm trying to send back to the main patch data from MSD in a
>> sub-process to separate GEM from MSD. When i only use [pd~] and
>> [stdout], it works but it is very slow, that's why i'm trying now with
>> [udpsend] without [stdout] hoping to gain speed.
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
More information about the Pd-list