[PD] problem using [udpsend] from iemnet (or mrpeach) in a sub-process (with [pd~])
bernardobarros2 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 20 16:58:23 CEST 2010
maybe as audio signal through JACK? That is the fastest way I'm aware.
That would be 441000 values per second per channel -1.0/+1.0, then you
had to rescale again.
2010/8/20 Jack <jack at rybn.org>:
> Hello Mathieu,
> I have already do that with [packOSC]/[unpackOSC] and
> [udpsend]/[udpreceive], it is slow too.
> I need to send 20000 lists of 3 floats (id, pos x, pos y) each frame (50
> fps) from one process to other.
> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 10:20 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Jack wrote:
>> > Is there another method to accelerate this transfert between GEM and MSD
>> > using [pd~] and [stdout] ?
>> Can you try communicating with OSC instead, and see whether it's faster ?
>> It does lesser amounts of encoding and decoding for floats, than what
>> [netsend]/[netreceive]/[stdout]/[pd~] need. How many floats do you need to
>> send from one process to the other, per second ?
>> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
>> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list