[PD] problem using [udpsend] from iemnet (or mrpeach) in a sub-process (with [pd~])
bernardobarros2 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 20 19:09:20 CEST 2010
>  if you don't do block processing
ah yes, I was thinking as one value per block.
2010/8/20 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 08/20/2010 05:45 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> Maybe that is a limitation of the PD "control rate" cords. You only
>> get "audio rate" messages between audio boxes.
> it took a while for me to understand what you actually mean...
> "control rate" really means "event-based" (asynchronous), and only at
> certain points in time (at the 64 samples boundary).
> the 64 samples boundary limits your latency (it will jitter up to 64
> samples), but it doesn't say anything about the bandwidth.
> you can send 100 times more data in a second between 2 [+] objects than
> between to [+~] objects .
>  plus an offset
>  if you don't do block processing.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list