[PD] FIR~ convolution array length bug

Andy Farnell padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Sun Aug 22 16:05:02 CEST 2010

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:38:50 +0200
Ludwig Maes <ludwig.maes at gmail.com> wrote:

> probably some offset problem? or
> hardcoded assumption that it will be longer than 2?

Convolution doesn't really make much sense for 1 
where it degenerates to simple multiplication.

Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list