[PD] Problems with "pool" object
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Fri Aug 27 17:40:45 CEST 2010
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, João Martins wrote:
> The usual reply to myself kind of thing. I've just tested an earlier
> pd-extended package, with GEM 0.91.3 (that's the one working in my Mac),
> and the problem persists. When I create a "pool" instance and open the
> help patch and then try to close it (this is the fastest way to test,
> since it produces the same output as putting a fid_class object into the
> patch), this is what I get at the terminal console:
If you can be sure that the problem comes from pool, but the error message
doesn't, then you can't rely on the glibc backtrace, nor on a gdb
backtrace either. You have to use valgrind, which can do early diagnostic,
instead of gdb and glibc that can only tell you the last step of the
death.
But I don't recall whether it works on OSX, or only Linux.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard on the road (in Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC).
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list