[PD] Problems with "pool" object

Mathieu Bouchard matju at artengine.ca
Fri Aug 27 17:40:45 CEST 2010


On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, João Martins wrote:

> The usual reply to myself kind of thing. I've just tested an earlier 
> pd-extended package, with GEM 0.91.3 (that's the one working in my Mac), 
> and the problem persists. When I create a "pool" instance and open the 
> help patch and then try to close it (this is the fastest way to test, 
> since it produces the same output as putting a fid_class object into the 
> patch), this is what I get at the terminal console:

If you can be sure that the problem comes from pool, but the error message 
doesn't, then you can't rely on the glibc backtrace, nor on a gdb 
backtrace either. You have to use valgrind, which can do early diagnostic, 
instead of gdb and glibc that can only tell you the last step of the 
death.

But I don't recall whether it works on OSX, or only Linux.

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard on the road (in Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC).


More information about the Pd-list mailing list