[PD] changing graph size prevents associated arrays from being properly redrawn

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I've seen this on at least two different computers running Ubuntu/ 
Lucid, and on Mac OS X.

.hc

On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Pedro Lopes wrote:

> I have the same issue on P dual core 2, with 10-04 and rc5.
>
> Also weird or not, I'm having the issue (a few times) on a AMD dual
> core, with pd extended 0.42 (not rc5).
>
> (i tested with array bug, although in tabwrite~ help the array syncs
> very well at all times... )
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Matthias Blau <blau_m at web.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> hm, not sure whether this really is the same bug.
>> On the machine where I originally discovered the problem (intel atom
>> processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-rc5), the arraybug.pd  
>> patch by
>> hcs doesn't update the array graph correctly, no matter whether "hide
>> object..." is checked or not.
>>
>> On another machine (intel core2 processor, Ubuntu 10.04,
>> pd-0.42.5-extended-20100105), the arraybug.pd patch updates the  
>> array graph
>> correctly all the time! Moreover, I can't reproduce the problem I was
>> describing in my post on this machine!
>>
>> So, it seems to be machine-dependent?
>> Very strange.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> On 08/30/2010 07:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Matthis,
>>>
>>> It sounds like you are describing this bug:
>>>
>>> donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload
>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=55736&atid=478070
>>>
>>> If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug  
>>> report?
>>> If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when  
>>> the bug
>>> report status changes.
>>>
>>> .hc
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the
>>>> following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd):
>>>> The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size  
>>>> of the
>>>> graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those  
>>>> arrays
>>>> will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner  
>>>> any
>>>> more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22  
>>>> (and
>>>> perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
>>>>
>>>> Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave  
>>>> it as
>>>> it is and not to touch it?
>>>>
>>>> If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu  
>>>> 10.04.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help,
>>>> Matthias
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>>  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc)
> contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
> website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no way to peace, peace is the way.       -A.J. Muste