[PD] Pd-extended 0.42.5 release candidate 6 released!

Roman Haefeli reduzent at gmail.com
Thu Sep 16 09:22:18 CEST 2010


On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:57 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> When people use Pd-extended 0.42.5, they expect that certain libraries
> will be there, and they will be a certain version.  For example
> Pd-extended 0.42.5 includes Gem 0.92.3.  So you can say "my patch works
> with Pd-extended 0.42.5" and it'll work with any installation of
> Pd-extended 0.42.5.

I totally got that. And I never meant to put that in question. 

> If Pd-extended 0.42.5 also looks at /usr/lib/pd, then someone could
> install Gem 0.93 there and Pd-extended would use it.  Let's say Gem 0.93
> introduces an obscure bug which breaks your patch.  Then someone who has
> installed Pd-extended 0.42.5 can no longer be sure that the patch will
> always work with Pd-extended 0.42.5.

That's why I proposed to put the path /usr/lib/pd/extra last in the
order. So Pd-extended would still load it's own Gem and not the manually
installed one. It's really *_only_* about making it easier to load
libraries that are *_not_yet_* part of Pd-extended while at the same
time not interfere with the libraries that are already part of
Pd-extended. I hope I could make myself clear now.


Roman





More information about the Pd-list mailing list