[PD] Latency

Pedro Lopes pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
Sat Sep 18 14:33:44 CEST 2010


>You can't expect decent drivers in Linux unless they are willing to >give
out the details and MOTU is apparently not.
So true! That's why I do not wish to support MOTU any more. (great hardware
anyway... terrible marketing choices to my perspective).


On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:37:39PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > USB 1.0 they all have same driver. Not true for 2.0 and maybe this is
> > not true for 3.0.
>
> Well, there is a standard for usb 2.0 audio devices AFAIK, but no device
> implements it, they all use their own proprietary stuff which makes Linux
> support diffictult, to say the least. For USB 1 the standard was widely
> adopted and works very well on Linux (some say better than on Windows).
>
> Ciao
> --
>  Frank Barknecht            Do You RjDj.me?          _ ______footils.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>



-- 
Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc)
contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100918/6766c110/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list