[PD] sssad in pd-extended?

[Frank Barknecht]

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:03:34AM -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> I think this has been asked before, but why isn't sssad included in
> pd-extended? It's stable and I've been using it for quite some time
> and I know its getting plenty of use in rjlib.

Apart from being packaged as its own Debian package (which is a new
requirement) it fulfills all requirements for pd-x-inclusion listed on
the puredata.info page. 

Maybe the question should better be: Why was sssad removed from
pd-extended after 0.41 and still is? My inquiries regarding the reasons
like http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg35153.html haven't
been answered. I can live with that, it's well known that I don't use
pd-x (things like the sssad-issue are only reinforcing this decision),
but I know, that many people would love to use sssad or already do but
hate it when they have to install a single-object library manually into
their pd-extended install.

> PS: Thanks 12848492048 times over Frank.

12848492048 welcomes! :) 

Ciao
-- 
Frank