[PD] sssad in pd-extended?

[Marco Donnarumma]

These questions, I don't know the answer to, IOhannes set those up. I
> personally think they are gratitious and should be removed.  I think we
> should have:
>
> * distributions
> * applications (curently stand-alone products)
> * libraries and externals (maybe just call it libraries)
> * GUI plugins
>
> And drop frameworks and graphics.
>
>
Yes, sounds good to me.


> All libraries that are ready for release should be listed there, IMHO.  I
> don't see a reason to exclude any as long its ready for people to download
> and use.
>

Ok, so i will start with that..




-- 
Marco Donnarumma aka TheSAD
Independent New Media Arts Professional, Performer, Teacher
Ongoing MSc by Research, University of Edinburgh, UK


PORTFOLIO: http://marcodonnarumma.com
LAB: http://www.thesaddj.com | http://cntrl.sourceforge.net |
http://www.flxer.net
EVENT: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100922/8149e700/attachment.htm>