[PD] control-flow (Re: jMax Phoenix)

Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 23 15:56:10 CEST 2010


Yes, I see there is a py object now. thanks

2010/9/23 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
> On 2010-09-22 20:58, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> Well maybe there is a Python object? If it has a neat and clean
>> implementations would be brilliant.
>
> i guess you are not really aware that there _is_ a python object?
> and bindings to all other kinds of languages, like lua,...
>
>>
>> 2010/9/22 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2 at gmail.com>:
>>> the only solution I see to write this kind of things in Max-like
>>> languages is to allow the user to just open a text-box and write what
>>> he/she wants in python or supercollider :-) that's for control
>>> structures, loops, etc
>
> if this is the only solution you see then you might really have some
> problems with the way Pd works :-)
>
> however, despite my brilliant defense of the Pd language, i would like
> to point out that there are indeed a lot of control-flow things that you
> cannot solve easily within a patcher language.
> some of them will probably always become unreadable spaghetti.
>
> that's why my second language is C/C++ (which i find much mor readable
> and esp. writeable than python)
>
> hmad
> IOhannes
>
>



More information about the Pd-list mailing list