[PD] pd-extended source

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Sat Sep 25 06:08:51 CEST 2010


If its needed for the build, then please add it to that wiki page :)

.hc

On Sep 23, 2010, at 8:30 PM, ailo wrote:

> My problem compiling the external "pidip" is now solved.
> After looking at Pd-0.42.5-extended/externals/pidip/INSTALL I  
> realized I hadn't installed:
> libimlib2-dev
> I'm pretty sure that was the problem. This library doesn't seem to  
> be mentioned at:
> http://puredata.info/docs/developer/Debian
>
> Also, the reason why I couldn't build http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pure-data/Pd-0.42.5-extended.tar.gz 
>  was because I had uninstalled the package "puredata", not realizing  
> it was a dependency.
>
> Anyway, here's my build of pd-extended for Ubuntu Maverick amd64,  
> for anyone who is interested.
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7703622/Pd-0.42.5-extended.deb
>
>
>
> On 09/17/2010 07:17 PM, ailo wrote:
>> I did a succesful build of pd-extended-rc6 on Ubuntu Maverick amd64.
>> Pidip did not compile, so I left it out . Still working on the build.
>>
>> I believe I got the source by doing the auto-build process:
>> rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd- 
>> extended/
>> ./pd-extended/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> I tried building from this source as well, once it was released:
>> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pure-data/Pd-0.42.5-extended.tar.gz
>>
>> Build failed already at bonk~.
>> Is pd (not pd-extended) not updated in this source?
>> What is different about this source?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mistrust authority - promote decentralization.  - the hacker ethic





More information about the Pd-list mailing list