[PD] namecanvas obsolete? Why? Re: Dynamic Graph on Parent
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Oct 5 12:10:59 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2010 12:42 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
> Though this fulfills brandon's requirements, it still doesn't
> obsolete [namecanvas]. There are some things you can do
> with dynamic patching and mouse messages that rely on namecanvas
how do they rely on properties of [namecanvas] that cannot be done with
[sendcanvas]?
fgmasdr
IOhannes
PS: and you are aware that your not-pretty tricks won't work if the
patch-window is not opened...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkyq+bMACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvS5GwCghp7G1mr2ogxtjk/Q2ieN8ETz
kd8Ani6I3BZOIVMV9Dt7qEfUStDcD48/
=A5tv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list