[PD] pix_opencv for Mac OS X
reduzent at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 00:13:36 CEST 2010
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:07 +0200, ydegoyon at gmail.com wrote:
> but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
That is certainly not true. You're looking from the wrong perspective.
It's not the case that someone decides _not_ to include certain
libraries, it's more that some people are interested in doing the work
to get certain libraries included. In the case of pdp there is not even
a need for that effort, since it is already included, as IOhannes
pointed out. Also here on my ubuntu 10.04 system:
~$ aptitude show pd-pdp
Feel free to become a member of the pkg-multimedia team in order to push
the packages you want into Debian. I don't think that anyone would
object to having also pidip and unauthorized in the repositories.
> ( once again and again, unilateral decision
> without discussion )
Thanks for starting that discussion now.
More information about the Pd-list