[PD] pix_opencv for Mac OS X

ydegoyon at gmail.com ydegoyon at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 04:38:17 CEST 2010


that's exactly the worst possible answer...

do it yourself and the author of pd-extended
will get the credits..

no thank you, pure:dyne seems very honest to me

furthermore i have many other things to do ... so, just not
wasting more time with pd-extended


Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:07 +0200, ydegoyon at gmail.com wrote:
>> but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
> That is certainly not true. You're looking from the wrong perspective.
> It's not the case that someone decides _not_ to include certain
> libraries, it's more that some people are interested in doing the work
> to get certain libraries included. In the case of pdp there is not even
> a need for that effort, since it is already included, as IOhannes
> pointed out. Also here on my ubuntu 10.04 system:
> ~$ aptitude show pd-pdp
> Package: pd-pdp
> Version: 1:0.12.5-1ubuntu1
> Feel free to become a member of the pkg-multimedia team in order to push
> the packages you want into Debian. I don't think that anyone would
> object to having also pidip and unauthorized in the repositories.
>> ( once again and again, unilateral decision
>> without discussion )
> Thanks for starting that discussion now.
> Roman

More information about the Pd-list mailing list