[PD] pix_opencv for Mac OS X

[ydegoyon at gmail.com]

ola,
>
> There is no one saying we have to abandon any of the libraries that 
> are included in Pd-extended.

you published a list of abandonned libraries...
> I am saying that I cannot keep up with all of the maintenance of all 
> of the libraries that I currently maintain in Pd-extended.

that's a different issue, i'm glad you'd rather explain it that way.
> I need help with that.  I have taken on many libraries which have no 
> other maintainer.  For things like PDP, PiDiP, etc. I hope that people 
> who actually use them will maintain them, and I can help where I can.  
> I barely do anything with video, so I hardly know how to test PDP, etc.

i know that but pd-extended was supposed to do video too no?
>
> Even better, the people working on pure:dyne packages and people 
> working on Pd-extended packages can merge efforts, get them into 
> Debian, then there will be no difference between PDP/PiDiP/etc whether 
> its included in pure:dyne or Pd-extended on Debian, Ubuntu, etc.  We 
> are already well along that road.

i understood there was no real agreement here,
because your packaging rules diverge no?
let's see what pure:dyne people can say about this,

sevy
>
> .hc
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
> 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling 
> away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another 
> pink-collar temp pool day.  - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf
>
>
>