[PD] OSC messages without / (fwd)

[Roman Haefeli]

Sorry, I definitely missed your reply then. Can you post the error
message again?

Roman

On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 02:46 +0200, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
> It partially worked. It seems to be something ALMOST there, but I got
> an error message. I posted a few days ago. But it's definitely the
> best solution right now
> 
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>         On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 09:40 +0200, Leandro da Mota Damasceno
>         wrote:
>         > Hi
>         >
>         >
>         > I would like to apologize for the private emails. it's that
>         when I
>         > reply to the messages they go to the author, not the list.
>         Weird.
>         > that's not what happens in other mailing lists...
>         >
>         >
>         > So, I have tried to fix the standalone as jasch suggested,
>         but i got
>         > all sorts of error messages. I would have to work almost
>         from scratch
>         > and if my knowledge on PD is still in beginner level, my
>         knowledge of
>         > max/MSP is almost null. Unfortunately, I'm on a deadline to
>         have this
>         > thing working, so I need a workaround by next week.
>         >
>         >
>         > So right now, I'd rather not mess with the standalone and
>         working on a
>         > new version by myself in a few weeks from now. Martin, I can
>         send you
>         > the patch, but I'm afraid it won't be any helpful for this
>         case, since
>         > it depends on dating coming from the standalone. I can give
>         it to you,
>         > of course, if you want. But I think it's pretty much what
>         has been
>         > described here. The best solution for now I think would be
>         to have a
>         > way to get ordinary messages through udp. No OSC standards.
>         >
>         
>         
>         Sorry in case I missed it, but did the abstraction I sent you
>         recently
>         not work? I don't think, that it should be too difficult to
>         find a way
>         to deal with the faulty OSC messages in Pd (so that you don't
>         have to
>         touch the standalone max/msp patch).
>         
>         Roman
>         
>         
>