[PD] Purpose of sig~

Jamie Bullock jamie at postlude.co.uk
Wed Nov 3 15:46:51 CET 2010


Hi all,

This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. Why not have implicit control -> signal conversion everywhere it is possible?

For example why not allow this?

|2(	|3(
|	|
[+~ ]

Jamie

--
http://www.jamiebullock.com






More information about the Pd-list mailing list