[PD] big soundfiles
João Pais
jmmmpais at googlemail.com
Fri Nov 26 02:10:40 CET 2010
how about removing the expXXX numbers, and use only concrete floats? or is
there any software reason that doesn't let that happen?
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
>
>> And keep in mind that sound quality goes down as file size goes up.
>> This is because of the interpolation. You might do better cutting your
>> file up and putting it into several different arrays.
>
> Oh, and isn't it the case that [tabread~] 0.42 has an extra inlet for
> the purpose of getting more precision ? The read point is now relative
> to a message-rate setting.
>
> If you have to play a very large file in RAM, you can do it by emptying
> your signal-rate counter into a message-rate counter that takes care of
> the big digits while the signal-rate counter keeps on taking care of the
> small digits and fractions. (do you want an example ?)
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------------- Aix-en-Provence
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Friedenstr. 58
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
Studio +49 30 69509190
jmmmpais at googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list