[PD] big soundfiles

João Pais jmmmpais at googlemail.com
Fri Nov 26 02:10:40 CET 2010


how about removing the expXXX numbers, and use only concrete floats? or is  
there any software reason that doesn't let that happen?

> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
>
>> And keep in mind that sound quality goes down as file size goes up.  
>> This is because of the interpolation. You might do better cutting your  
>> file up and putting it into several different arrays.
>
> Oh, and isn't it the case that [tabread~] 0.42 has an extra inlet for  
> the purpose of getting more precision ? The read point is now relative  
> to a message-rate setting.
>
> If you have to play a very large file in RAM, you can do it by emptying  
> your signal-rate counter into a message-rate counter that takes care of  
> the big digits while the signal-rate counter keeps on taking care of the  
> small digits and fractions. (do you want an example ?)
>
>   _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------------- Aix-en-Provence
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


-- 
Friedenstr. 58
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
Studio +49 30 69509190
jmmmpais at googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp



More information about the Pd-list mailing list