[PD] call for testers for L2Ork iteration of pd-extended (based on 0.42.x branch)

[Ivica Ico Bukvic]

Lol, I meant to say "next" piece (silly android voice recognition)...

Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:

>Great suggestion! That might work quite nicely. We only have to make sure for legacy purposes that wherever in the old code this variable is being checked that it can gracefully handle values less than 0.
>
>That said, my top priority as of right now is further testing current code as well as continuing to work on my neck piece. Beyond that I would like to make all iem objects resizable via GUI, revamp the to-front and to-back algorithm so that it does not rely upon undo, followed by an "infinite" undo, and then tooltips, improved color picker, improve upon the tidy algorithm, and then weed through the documentation and externals and only keep those that are well maintained and are not redundant. Your suggestion might fit nicely somewhere inside here as well.
>
>I would also like to see Qt-ified (or better yet juce-ified) version of the whole thing. This will however have to wait.
>
> Long story short it might be a while before I make the next big push. In the meantime, as always, contributions will be most welcome provided they do not break the backwards compatibility.
>
>Cheers!
>
>Ico