[PD] More SVN build questions

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:

>>> Cool. Thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>> So is it therefore safe to assume that flatspace, flib, and toxy are
>>> for
>>> all intents and purposes obsolete (at least for the time being)?
>>
>> If anyone wants to maintain them, they can take them on.  I  
>> personally
>> really think 'flatspace' should go away.  flib and toxy are
>> interesting libraries, if anyone wants to be the maintainer of them.
>> I just can't do it all.
>
> BTW, it seems to me that flatspace is simply a redundant collection  
> of select externals from other libraries (with perhaps a few  
> exceptions), no? That said, I just discovered that at least one of  
> the pddp abstractions relies upon flatspace/prepend (e.g. print-to- 
> canvas object inside pddp).


Fixed those.  Yeah, flatspace is based on the idea of having a single  
namespace with a managed collection of objects.

.hc


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is  
related to the telescope.      -Edsger Dykstra