[PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian
Andy Farnell
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Mon Dec 6 15:01:24 CET 2010
Ouch, my eyes!
http://www.352media.com/rantingandraving/CMFiles/Images/CapsLock.jpg
Shouting in caps lock doen't make it LEGAL!!!11! or something :)
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:42:03 -0500 (EST)
Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, John Harrison wrote:
>
> > I was curious, since EffecTV is GPL and a significant part of PiDiP is a port
> > of EffecTV --- does this make an impact on what licenses are valid for PiDiP?
>
> Relicensing of EffecTV code from GPL to Degoyon license is ILLEGAL, and
> linking of EffecTV code frorm GPL to Degoyon license is ALSO ILLEGAL. Back
> in 2005, I hadn't considered the use of EffecTV code (if I recall), but
> there was other GPL'ed code anyway in PiDiP, which was already making
> redistribution ILLEGAL.
>
> Any change of license of EffecTV must get prior written approval by
> Kentaro Fukuchi and any other possible contributors, but that doesn't make
> GPL compatible with Degoyon license (the GPL must be replaced by a more
> «bendable» license such as plain BSD).
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
--
Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list