[PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

Andy Farnell padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Tue Dec 7 09:50:03 CET 2010


You could be forgiven. The effort to forge this confusion is 
one of the defining propaganda campaigns of the 21st Century.
There are lawyers out there who don't know the difference.

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:54:19 -0500 (EST)
Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> > Its not "illegal" because its a not about laws, but rather copyright 
> > licenses, which is more like contracts, i.e. agreements between private 
> > parties.
> 
> Right. I used the wrong word. I'm sorry.
> 
>   _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC


-- 
Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>



More information about the Pd-list mailing list