[PD] if not currently recieving a 1 then send 0

[Jack]

Or like this ? ;)
++

Jack



Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Montgermont a
écrit :
> something like this?
> very arbitrary though, it should be better to receive 0 when the
> condition is false.
> n
> 
> Le 08/12/10 04:07, Ben Carney a écrit : 
> > I don't think I am very good at asking pure data related questions. 
> > 
> > 
> > the 1000 milliseconds is an arbitrary number.
> > 
> > 
> > I am just trying to deduce that  a 1 is not being sent or received.
> > for any amount of time.
> > 
> > 
> > so the example I gave was everything that wasn't a 1 in that second
> > would be spat out as a zero.
> > 
> > 
> > is that a bit more clear?
> > 
> > 
> > I am doing this as I am receiving data from someone else's
> > processing sketch that is sending 1s if a certain condition is met.
> > However, In this processing sketch there are no zeros being sent if
> > this condition is no longer met, so It is up to me to decipher if
> > whether or not this condition is true any longer.
> > 
> > 
> > It confuses me quite a bit too, which is why i came to the list.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > hope I am clear here, and thanks a bunch for taking the time to take
> > a look at my problem!
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Mathieu Bouchard
> > <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:
> >         On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Ben Carney wrote:
> >         
> >                 lets say I have a metro that sends a bang every one
> >                 second, for the rest of the 999 miliseconds, could I
> >                 somehow deduce a zero message?
> >                 it doesn't need to be that granular(I don't need 999
> >                 0s for every 1)
> >         
> >         
> >         Even though the base unit of [metro]'s time is the
> >         millisecond, it doesn't mean that a millisecond is somehow
> >         any kind of building block of pd's concept of time. You can
> >         have fractional delays of your choice, within the limits of
> >         the float32 format and of the manner of writing it (not too
> >         many decimals...).
> >         
> >         Well, actually, [metro] has an artificial lower limit at
> >         1.000000, but if you imitate [metro] using [delay] connected
> >         to itself, you don't have that limitation.
> >         
> >         In the light of this, the question doesn't make much
> >         practical sense. But suppose you still want it. You have to
> >         put a [delay 1] so that at the same time you set the "1",
> >         you set a clock that will set the "0" after 1 ms of time.
> >         
> >         Alternately, you can have a [metro 1] connected to a counter
> >         that loops at 1000.
> >         
> >          _______________________________________________________________________
> >         | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray,
> >         Montréal, QC
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > benfcarney
> > www.benfcarney.com
> > Chicago, IL 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> -- 
> http://nim.on.free.fr
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: receiveOnes.pd
Type: application/x-extension-pd
Size: 748 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101208/736c0161/attachment.bin>