[PD] PD OOP?

[Jonathan Wilkes]

Jmax Phoenix does this.  If I recall correctly it breaks the nested list feature 
in Gridflow.

But considering your [osc~ (pitch * 2)] 
example-- what would happen if you change the value of pitch?  The value 
of the [osc~] object's argument is assigned to be the initial frequency only 
when the object is created, so it doesn't seem like it would have an effect 
unless you recreate the object.  (I'm curious what Jmax Phoenix does in this 
regard.)

-Jonathan


--- On Mon, 12/13/10, Andrew Faraday <jbturgid at hotmail.com> wrote:

From: Andrew Faraday <jbturgid at hotmail.com>
Subject: [PD] PD OOP?
To: pd-list at iem.at
Date: Monday, December 13, 2010, 10:34 PM




Hey All

I've had a bit of a daydream about a further development in PD. Could an expression be placed into the arguments of an object, or even a named receive become part of expr

I suppose the dream would be to have something like

[osc~ (pitch * 2)] 

instead of

[r pitch]
|
[* 2]
|
[osc~]

or even 

[expr pitch * 2]
|
[osc~]

And other such space-saving arguments.

Does anyone know of anything like this to streamline pd? Or am I just dreaming here?

Cheers

Andrew
 		 	   		  

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101213/5fb46e71/attachment.htm>