[PD] PD OOP?
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Wed Dec 15 15:49:53 CET 2010
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> What exactly would "this" (#4) look like in Pd?
>> 1. Everything is global
>> 4. No concept of "this"
The use of the $0- prefix for receive-symbols ([r]) and variables ([v]).
It's a hack. I made a similar hack for making OOP in Tcl, but at least,
Tcl allows me a simple, natural syntax for introducing my own procedure
definition procedure, which allows me to implement macros so that
_($this:stuff) is written @stuff.
That was with Tcl 8.4 ; In Tcl 8.6 there's finally a built-in object
system, but I don't really remember what it looks like (I looked at it a
bit in 2007, back when it was planned for Tcl 8.5).
_______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list