[PD] PD OOP?

[brandon zeeb]

Agreed.  By "everything" I should have been more precise:

   1. tables
   2. ui elements
   3. values
   4. send/receive
   5. throw/catch
   6. I'm probably forgetting something...

All of the above are available globally within a given patch without some
kind of namespacing (either with $0 or some eventual derivative thereof).

In a scalable Pd patch, this makes up most of the communication in a given
patch.  You are right, when something must be local, a patch cord is most
appropriate.

Cheers,
~Brandon

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> On 2010-12-15 13:51, brandon zeeb wrote:
>>
>>>   1. Everything is global
>>>
>> hmm, i'd say the content of a message is as local as can be.
>>
>
> A patchcord by itself is also pretty local. Think of it as some kind of
> function-pointer (or rather, inlet-pointer).
>
>
>  _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
Brandon Zeeb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101215/9bb52d86/attachment-0001.htm>