[PD] PD OOP?
Jonathan Wilkes
jancsika at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 16 01:01:50 CET 2010
As for named variables, [rl] and [sl] are local.
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 12/15/10, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] PD OOP?
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 4:19 PM
> On 2010-12-15 15:38, brandon zeeb
> wrote:
> > The point here refers to the common use of $0.
> This isn't necessarily a bad
> > thing (and is actually helpful in most cases), but can
> make certain things a
> > little more difficult with regards to true OOP.
>
> the point i was trying to make is: people usually argue
> that variables
> in Pd are global (even if you prefix them with "$0"), while
> they are
> really talking about _named_ variables and ignoring that Pd
> has a
> concept of passing data without naming variables at all
> that is entirely
> local.
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list