[PD] PD OOP?

[Jonathan Wilkes]

Would you make use of the following if they were included in Pd vanilla?

* symbol2list
* initbang and closebang
* a way to read a text file that's guaranteed to not generate a bad argument 
error

-Jonathan


--- On Thu, 12/16/10, brandon zeeb <zeeb.brandon at gmail.com> wrote:

From: brandon zeeb <zeeb.brandon at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PD] PD OOP?
To: "Mathieu Bouchard" <matju at artengine.ca>
Cc: "PD List" <pd-list at iem.at>
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 1:45 AM

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, brandon zeeb wrote:





do you, really ?




Why are people getting offended here?




Am I getting offended ? How would you know, anyway ?

Well, you're certainly argumentative :-/
 

Having to reinvent all that's outside of pd-vanilla is a more severe information overload.

If your background is in software development, then you know that you should rely on libraries to get stuff done.




I use Pd to help learn these basics, and I will use pd-extended when I've mastered the basics.




But, as I said, many of what I consider to be basics are outside of pd-vanilla (while several things in pd-vanilla are rarely ever used by anyone).

Relying on the pre-baked solution that is pd-extended doesn't make for a very rewarding learning experience.  Yet, if I were being paid for this, I would definitely be making use of pd-extended because as you mentioned, my primary motivation would be getting stuff done.  As a software developer, I'm keen on avoiding the reliance on superfluous dependency, and right now pd-extended is just that.



With that in mind, what's the point in using a pre-baked filter if I haven't created my own




It's so that you don't have to create your own.

As I mentioned, I do want to create my own... to learn.





Using IoC / Strategy, you create your abstraction and pass a symbol referencing the metronome you want to use.



But you can also create the [metro] outside of the object, provided that you have an inlet in the abstraction that accepts the bangs, and zero, one or two outlets for connecting back to [metro] depending on needs. Isn't that IoC ?

Yes, that would be a fine example when the payload is rather simple, and when tilde~ objects aren't involved (block delay!).  Anything beyond 1 or two outlet/inlet pairs would probably be too cryptic for my uses, but the same would go for creation style IoC.

 



In Java / Spring IoC psuedocode:




No idea what Spring is... and it doesn't seem to be used in your pseudocode, does it ?
Most Java classes used in Spring follow that example with setters for most dependencies.  With regards to IoC, Spring is the agent that deals with creating objects, resolving setter and constructor dependency, and connecting them together.  This is accomplished either through XML, annotations, or simple code (as in my example, where I'm instantiating the objects myself).


-- 
Brandon Zeeb




-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101215/818602fc/attachment.htm>