[PD] timing

[Dietrich Pank]

so is it correct to state that the workaround setting block~ size down to 1
for sample correct works is not existant for

> most (maybe all, not sure) signal-to-message objects

besause they

> have a minimum hard limit of 64 samples.


?
[?]




2010/12/24 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>

> On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:04 -0500, Mike Moser-Booth wrote:
> >
> > On 12/23/10 8:51 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 08:10 -0500, Mike Moser-Booth wrote:
> > >> [bang~], [edge~], and [threshold~] I've noticed for sure are like
> this.
> > >> I don't know about [vline~] since I use it to avoid having to change
> the
> > >> block size. :-)
> > > I happily repeat myself:
> > > There is no need to adjust the block size when using [vline~].
> >
> > Yeah, that's what I was trying to say.
>
> Sorry for not reading your post carefully. That's indeed what you said.
>
> Roman
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101224/b45afd7e/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 540 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101224/b45afd7e/attachment-0001.gif>