[PD] loadbang not sent for dynamically created objects?

[Pedro Lopes]

Yeah, if its the logical behaviour of the "class": ok. As i said,
comment withdrawn.

I agree with Mathieu, I'll just use one of the unsupported stuff out there.

2011/2/20 IOhannes zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>

> On 02/19/2011 08:49 PM, Pedro Lopes wrote:
> >> yes, this is known.
> > By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already?
> >
>
> it is a feature, not a bug.
> please consult the mailing list archives for why it makes sense for
> loadbang to behave like it does.
>
> fgadmr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
Pedro Lopes (MSc)
contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes /
http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110220/af5c152f/attachment.htm>