[PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?
jancsika at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 8 06:34:52 CET 2011
--- On Tue, 3/8/11, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> From: Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 5:56 AM
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:07:08PM
> -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Miller Puckette wrote:
> >> Sorry -- there's no way to do that!
> > Yes there is a way to do it, but it takes 5 hours to
> find out how to do
> > it in pd, while it takes 5 minutes to edit the C code
> so that people can
> > do it in pd in 5 seconds. But most of all it takes 0.5
> second to write
> > "sorry".
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:40:39PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard
> > PS: the [delwrite~] clear method
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3170987&group_id=55736&atid=478072
> > is still assigned to "nobody", because it's waiting
> for any of the five
> > project admins to click on a button... It also didn't
> appear on
> > pd-dev at iem.at
> either :
> > http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2011-02/thread.html
> Do you think that what you have written above is likely to
> increase or decrease
> your chances of getting those patches accepted more
> quickly? I ask this
> question sincerely.
I think a better question would be put to Miller or Hans, or the other
admins-- can someone please explain how the patch review process works?
Not only is the patch in question is now over a month old with no signs
of the review having begun, but it was submitted to the tracker in direct
response to a user's request for the feature. If there's a problem
with it there should at least be a relevant comment by this point.
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list