[PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?

[Jonathan Wilkes]

--- On Tue, 3/8/11, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 9:51 AM
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2011-03-08 06:34, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > 
> > I think a better question would be put to Miller or
> Hans, or the other 
> > admins-- can someone please explain how the patch
> review process works?  
> 
> it's very simple:
> each patch is assigned to a person (well, let's assume it
> is).

Ok, then the problem is equally simple: the patch in question is 
not currently assigned to anyone.  Could someone choose the 
"millerpuckette" option on the tracker for patch id #3170987, please?

> whenever the assignee feels like it, they would browse to
> sf.net and
> have a look at the patches that are assigned to them (and
> probably at
> patches that are not assigned to them, though it seems that
> they should)
> if they have a good they, they eventually apply a given
> patch
> (considering they like how it is done), fix a given bug
> (considering
> they find a way to do it) or just close an invalid report.
> 
> there is an agreement, that only miller manages the core
> Pd.
> (hence there are a lot of patches in the tracker submitted
> by hans or me
> or other "admins")
> 
> 
> > Not only is the patch in question is now over a month
> old with no signs 
> > of the review having begun, but it was submitted to
> the tracker in direct 
> > response to a user's request for the feature.  If
> there's a problem 
> > with it there should at least be a relevant comment by
> this point.
> 
> indeed.
> 
> here comes the usual rant (you can safely skip it, if not
> in the mood):
> feel free to employ one (or several) of the people
> responsible for
> fixing your problems. then you can define the review
> process (e.g. that
> people have to react on an issue within a minimum time).
> you could even press them into accepting a given patch (or
> to come up
> with an alternative solution)
> since you are interested in getting a feature into core Pd,
> i suggest to
> hire miller.
> in the meantime you might have to accept that people have
> dynamic
> priorities which might not overlap with yours.
> end of the usual rant.
> 
> mfgasdr
> IOhannes
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk117h4ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTWkwCfVLcnqV/EGjPTwBB/1axkjWqO
> mbcAoJRpq/abzebKGhZ5gJKPNz1EDRG1
> =7Tww
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>