[PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?

Mathieu Bouchard matju at artengine.ca
Tue Mar 8 20:16:53 CET 2011

On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 09:47, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> iirc, this was discussed on the pd-dev list prior to enabling the
>>> "feature".
>> Is reading pd-dev a requirement for people who submit to the patchtracker ?
> i don't think so. however, if people complain that there posts are not 
> processed in the way they imagine that they should, they might want to 
> familiarize themselves with the way others imagine it.

How does that not mean "I think so" ?

How would anyone find out about the rule, other than reading a few years 
of pd-dev until stumbling upon that thread ; or writing a mail that will 
be interpreted as being a "complaint" simply because "report" and 
"inquiry" aren't in the vocabulary ?

| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC

More information about the Pd-list mailing list