[PD] The economics of Open source
czhenry at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 23:27:46 CET 2011
I thought I'd pose a question to you, for academic curiosity. For example,
in my current line of work, cluster computing, there's a lot of possible
funding models for supporting maintenance, and they all have different
~unintended consequences. (ex) You lose customers, waste cycles, delay
research schedules, and they all have some other costs associated.
Economics just works that way.
But in general, I wonder what produces the best outcomes for software
development. It's an impossible question to answer without having much time
to waste, so don't try too hard :)
Could a open-source project with a funding model lead to better code than a
Could you just dangle some cash on the end of a string and the cats will
just herd themselves?
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Hello , Mathieu! Well, I did not refer to implementation of new features,
>> but the maintenance of that code that already works, fixing bugs.
> Ok, so, basically, buggy software gets rewarded for requests to fix bugs.
> Bugless software is not rewarded : it does not pay. Therefore we are
> encouraged to put enough bugs in there so that we get money. Nevermind the
> high-reliability ideals.
> (Of course, don't let my comments prevent you from contributing money. I'm
> just trying to say that some assumptions about funding may encourage the
> wrong things and cause strange compensations.)
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list