[PD] What version of GEM should I use with pd 0.43-0 vanilla

Billy Stiltner billy.stiltner at gmail.com
Sun Apr 10 07:04:32 CEST 2011


On 4/10/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Patrice Colet wrote:
>
>>
>> ----- "Billy Stiltner" <billy.stiltner at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> On 4/7/11, patko <colet.patrice at free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>> you know when you add an external path it will be available from all
>>> pd
>>>> versions because
>>>> it's litterally a full path name that is added by the new tcl
>>> interface, and
>>>> because vanilla and extended shares the same config file.
>>>> that's why I use to start patches made for vanilla with a .bat
>>> script, then
>>>> I can set exactly what I need in pd for my application.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually on my machine there are separate registry entries for pdx
>>> and
>>> pd.
>>> both versions of vanilla I have installed share the same registry
>>> entry.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> interesting
>>
>>>
>>>>> The problem with using externals with cross platform applications
>>> is
>>>>> if you don't supply the library on all 3 platforms then there may
>>> be
>>>>> some people that cant use your patch.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's why I think that pd-extended should add only externals
>>> available on
>>>> all 3 platforms.
>>>> It's not really the job of patch developpers to provide cross
>>> platform
>>>> externals and libraries but the job of the external developpers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a list of externals that work on all 3 platforms?
>>
>> I don't know if there is such a list, but I'd be glad to add several
>> externals I've been able to compile with my machine,
>> and comment about how it has been done, then pdx maintainers could
>> had them to the build farm.
>> The problem is that most pdx externals building use a single
>> Makefile for compilation that resides in externals, so it makes tricky
>> patch submiting, because it's a lot easier to use the Makefile
>> provided by the dev in most cases (that's happening with
>> unauthorized externals for example).
>> I sometimes submit dll's to the list, but it's not really a good
>> thing.
>>
>> if one is interested I've built these ones lately:
>>
>> exciter
>> filterbank
>> formant
>> pianoroll
>> probalizer
>> samplebox
>> sonogram
>> speex
>> spigot~
>>
>> most just need -liberty in linker flags
>
> I would be great to have this included, please submit a patch to the
> patch tracker :)
>
> .hc
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> “We must become the change we want to see. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
>

If speex is a text to speech thing I would be very interested in
checking it out.



More information about the Pd-list mailing list