[PD] What version of GEM should I use with pd 0.43-0 vanilla

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Apr 10, 2011, at 1:04 AM, Billy Stiltner wrote:

> On 4/10/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Patrice Colet wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ----- "Billy Stiltner" <billy.stiltner at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On 4/7/11, patko <colet.patrice at free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> you know when you add an external path it will be available from  
>>>>> all
>>>> pd
>>>>> versions because
>>>>> it's litterally a full path name that is added by the new tcl
>>>> interface, and
>>>>> because vanilla and extended shares the same config file.
>>>>> that's why I use to start patches made for vanilla with a .bat
>>>> script, then
>>>>> I can set exactly what I need in pd for my application.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually on my machine there are separate registry entries for pdx
>>>> and
>>>> pd.
>>>> both versions of vanilla I have installed share the same registry
>>>> entry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> interesting
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> The problem with using externals with cross platform applications
>>>> is
>>>>>> if you don't supply the library on all 3 platforms then there may
>>>> be
>>>>>> some people that cant use your patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's why I think that pd-extended should add only externals
>>>> available on
>>>>> all 3 platforms.
>>>>> It's not really the job of patch developpers to provide cross
>>>> platform
>>>>> externals and libraries but the job of the external developpers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there a list of externals that work on all 3 platforms?
>>>
>>> I don't know if there is such a list, but I'd be glad to add several
>>> externals I've been able to compile with my machine,
>>> and comment about how it has been done, then pdx maintainers could
>>> had them to the build farm.
>>> The problem is that most pdx externals building use a single
>>> Makefile for compilation that resides in externals, so it makes  
>>> tricky
>>> patch submiting, because it's a lot easier to use the Makefile
>>> provided by the dev in most cases (that's happening with
>>> unauthorized externals for example).
>>> I sometimes submit dll's to the list, but it's not really a good
>>> thing.
>>>
>>> if one is interested I've built these ones lately:
>>>
>>> exciter
>>> filterbank
>>> formant
>>> pianoroll
>>> probalizer
>>> samplebox
>>> sonogram
>>> speex
>>> spigot~
>>>
>>> most just need -liberty in linker flags
>>
>> I would be great to have this included, please submit a patch to the
>> patch tracker :)
>>
>> .hc
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> “We must become the change we want to see. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>
>>
>
> If speex is a text to speech thing I would be very interested in
> checking it out.



speex is a codec like vorbis or mp3.  You want [moocow/flite].

.hc


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can  
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie