[PD] is OOURA fft algorithm still used?
msp at ucsd.edu
Tue May 31 21:55:06 CEST 2011
Hmm, I think Pd is using both OOURA and Mayer, which have different
APIs, because I haven't taken the time to rewrite the Mayer API
to use OOURA.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Rich E wrote:
> So is it just in there so that you can compile it in if you feel like
> changing the makefile, or why is d_fft_fftsg.c included in the source?
> Miller, why not use OOURA instead of Maynard, now that we know it is faster
> and more versatile? I could have sworn that about 1 year ago, pd was using
> the OOURA algorithm.
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Rich E <reakinator at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Is the OOURA fft algorithm (d_fft_fftsg.c) ever used in pd? I can't really
> > tell from the makefile (granted, I don't really know how to use the
> > autotools system), but I cannot see the file ever compiled into pd during
> > the make.
> > I though that OOURA was the fastest and most flexible fft algorithm
> > included in pd..
> > cheers,
> > Rich
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list