[PD] Debian: Pd-extended VS debian packages

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Jun 6 10:52:25 CEST 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-06-06 00:08, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> It looks like many extended libraries are now packaged in debian. But
> what is the difference with the extended distribution?
> Also would it make sense to have something (TM) that would install
> packages to have an as-near-as-possible extended install?
> I *think* I downloaded all the possible pd-* puredata-* packages, but
> for example I'm missing the iem-gui libs and [init] which I use quite
> often. I guess some stuff is left out because of packaging standards
> requirements.

packaging all the libraries that are currently part of pd-extended is
currently in progress.
not all libs have been packaged yet.
pd-extended itself (that is: the core of PdX, without any libs) is
pending as well.

fmgasdr
IOhannes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3slUkACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQ7ZQCg4yznwXgINK7GwRZyeCeI+KFm
wCEAoOYU+9n1Lt0GR/pMsen7NcEA0ki/
=vdH1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110606/7e916b12/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list