[PD] Pd performance at TED

Ingo ingo at miamiwave.com
Sun Jun 19 18:15:18 CEST 2011

I absolutely agree with you, Hans!
Onyx is doing great live playing with traditional rhythms and phrasings
using his own custom built "wind controller" and Pd.
I'm not sure what would classify music with no rhythmical elements and
scales and chords as being more artistic? 


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: pd-list-bounces at iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces at iem.at] Im Auftrag von
Hans-Christoph Steiner
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011 17:32
An: Mathieu Bouchard
Cc: pd-list at iem.at; Marco Donnarumma
Betreff: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED

On Jun 19, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
>> it seems quite sad to me that the first performance with pd at ted  
>> has to be this. With all the respect due to Onyx, but using control  
>> sensor to play as a dj seems a technological parody. Besides, the  
>> whole system looks a bit clunky, doesn't it?
> Does it ?
> Do you care to explain yourself ?
> What's a « technological parody » ?
> And what's that thing you call a « dj » ? You use it in your own  
> name thesaddj. What's your relationship with that word ?

I think the key is not what it looks like, but what he does with it.   
He's making music with it (no ifs, ands, or buts), he clearly has  
musical skill with his instrument, and is able to keep the musical  
timing tight.  These are all difficult things to do, and from what  
I've seen 95% of performance with new interfaces for musical  
expression does not achieve one of those goals solidly.



"Making boring techno music is really easy with modern tools, but with  
live coding, boring techno is much harder." - Chris McCormick

Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

More information about the Pd-list mailing list