[PD] Pd performance at TED

Jonathan Wilkes jancsika at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 22 20:23:50 CEST 2011

Dear Miller,
B07.sampler.pd is a technological parody.

Please tell me whether that means that a) Miller should remove that tutorial, 
b) he should revise it to be better, c) it's a waste of time for Miller to read it at all,
c) something else.

If you didn't choose a or b, then please explain how all of you can possibly be in 
agreement about any kind of judgment, aesthetic or otherwise, or even 
understand the relevance of each other's responses, merely by referring to the 
performance as a "technological parody".


--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Olivier Baudu <lamouraupeuple at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Olivier Baudu <lamouraupeuple at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" <hans at at.or.at>
Cc: pd-list at iem.at, "Marco Donnarumma" <devel at thesaddj.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 6:59 PM

Hi list,

Whether or not you like his music is a separate question, I think its

very hard to refute that he has musical skill and talent with his

instrument.  And that is very rare with new interfaces for musical



I totally agree with you but only since he's explained how works his instrument...
It's pity that, on the video, the performance seems to show someone who's triggering some pre-recorded patterns...

In that case, I was quite agree with the "technological parody" expression... :-p

But it's not... and, clearly, Onyx has to be congratulated.



Envie de tisser ?


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110622/35b2f9cc/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list