[PD] pdp: Handling pdp_v4l VS pdp_v4l2 and possibly updating the examples

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Mon Jun 27 06:17:10 CEST 2011

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:05 +0200, "Charles Goyard" <cg at fsck.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> > I wonder now-a-days what the statistics are with v4l and v4l2 devices
> > and which are currently more 'representative' (i.e. is v4l still very
> > widely used?)
> Since v4l1 support has been dumped from the kernel, I believe statistics
> will be in favor of v4l2.
> cheers,
> Charlot

Sounds like a good idea to switch the pdp and its docs to v4l2 then!  If
you submit a patch to the patch tracker, I can commit it.


More information about the Pd-list mailing list