[PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

András Murányi muranyia at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 15:36:35 CEST 2011


On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:

>
> I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still
> needed:
>
> http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/64BitLinux<http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux>
> http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/**BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuI**
> ntrepid<http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid>
>
> 0.43 should work fine on all 64-bit systems (never tested Windows tho).
>
> .hc
>

Well, do these apply to to 0.42 in any way? If not any more, they can go.
However, it could be nice to have a short writeup on the history of 64-bit
in Pd, most importantly stating the version from which it does not make a
difference any more.

Andras
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110706/f4735ce6/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list