[PD] route - pack issue

[Joe White]

Yeah, thought as much. Just a bit annoying.

Thanks,
Joe

On 7 July 2011 17:57, Jack <jack at rybn.org> wrote:

> Yep, there is a bug. For a workaround, you can add a [bang( message
> between [route] and [pack].
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> Le jeudi 07 juillet 2011 à 17:44 +0100, Joe White a écrit :
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> > I've been doing some patching with [route] and came across a problem -
> > I'd love it if someone could explain why this happens otherwise I
> > think it's a bug.
> >
> >
> > Basically I'm sending a message with one item to a route object with
> > an argument of the same name. For example:
> >
> >
> > [start (
> > |
> > [route start]
> >
> >
> > This is connected to a [pack f]. When I bang the start message the
> > route object outputs a bang, which in turn should output the stored
> > number in the pack object. However, this does not happen (which is the
> > problem).
> >
> >
> > If I connect a [t b] after the [route] and before the [pack f] it
> > works. It also works with [f ] instead of [pack f] and a [select]
> > object will correctly bang the pack. I've attached a patch to show
> > this.
> >
> >
> > What seems weird is that it is not a problem with either [route] or
> > [pack f] on their own, but rather only when they are connected.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110707/c7ea9877/attachment.htm>