[PD] fx chaining without glitch

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

You could make an abstraction that includes the effects that you are  
interested in. So it would be a limited set.  Then you can chain these  
freely, and switch them between the effects.

.hc

On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> How are you gonna patch this without creating DSP loops?
>
> Roman
>
>
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:48 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I think the way you'd do it to prevent glitches is to have them in
>> subpatches, always attached, and then turn them on and off with a  
>> [*~]
>> and a [switch~].
>> On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:44 PM, patrick wrote:
>>
>>> hi everyone,
>>>
>>> i would like to make a patch with multiple fx~ _but_ is it  
>>> possible to
>>> chain the fx~ and change the order without a single glitch in the  
>>> dsp.
>>> as an example:
>>>
>>> [adc~]
>>> |
>>> [reverb~]
>>> |
>>> [distortion~]
>>> |
>>> [dac~]
>>>
>>> now pressing a bang and automagically:
>>>
>>> [adc~]
>>> |
>>> [distortion~]
>>> |
>>> [reverb~]
>>> |
>>> [dac~]
>>>
>>> is it possible in pd?
>>> thanks,
>>> pat
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> "[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are
>> deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from
>> scarcity."        -John Gilmore
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can  
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie