[PD] Interruption of audio / Loading sound into array
matju at artengine.ca
Thu Nov 3 22:50:33 CET 2011
Le 2011-11-03 à 15:52:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
> On Nov 3, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> Le 2011-11-03 à 15:32:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
>>> Threading is not the only way to do concurrency. Think of all of
>>> those objects in your patch, they are all running in parallel. And
>>> you had to do nothing to make sure that they run in parallel, don't
>>> block each other, sync up, etc.
>> Are you talking about Pd ?
>> (you surely are not)
> It is only recently that threads started to run at actually the same
> time, and that is still not a guaranteed thing. So yes, we experience
> apps running "at the same time" but for the most part, there is a lot of
> time slicing involved, just like Pd. There is only one arm on the hard
> disk heads still, for example.
Which objects of Pd are actually using threads ?
It's not all of them.
Think of what is taught as the execution order of Pd, and think about how
it conflicts with the idea of running everything in parallel.
Actually, among academics, the #1 reason for refusing to call Pd a
dataflow language, is because they use a definition of «dataflow» that
allows all messages to be threaded, whereas Pd is threading very few
What is the goal of Miller's new [pd~] project ? It exists because Pd
itself is not already doing it.
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
More information about the Pd-list