[PD] pix_mask and gemframebuffer

[Max]

thanks cyrille,
am i getting closer?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: masking2.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20111109/1810a36a/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


it's ok if it is slow, but i want to use gem objects to make a mask i can animate in gem, so there is now way around the snapping if i understand that correctly.

max


Am 09.11.2011 um 14:07 schrieb cyrille henry:

> hello,
> pix_masque need a pix, not a texture.
> (one is in the CPU, the other in the GPU).
> you need a pix_snap to pass the texture to a pix object.
> beware, this is slow.
> i recommend using a shader to emulate pix_masque, but using 2 texture and not 2 pix.
> it will be hundred time faster.
> 
> 
> Cyrille
> 
> 
> Le 09/11/2011 11:52, Max a écrit :
>> dear list,
>> 
>> i'm trying to generate a b/w mask in gemframebuffer for a pix_mask
>> pix_mask seems to ignore the texture from gemframbuffer.
>> hints appreciated.
>> m.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20111109/1810a36a/attachment.pgp>